Production Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the . What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. //--> This is known as a rescinding. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Thank you for visiting nature.com. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. [CDATA[> Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Editor Decision When making a decision, we expect that the academic editor checks the following: The suitability of selected reviewers; Adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; Overall scientific quality of the paper. March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Press J to jump to the feed. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. [CDATA[> How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. sinastria di coppia karmica calcolo; quincy homeless shelter; plastic bags for cleaning oven racks; claudia procula death; farm jobs in vermont with housing Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Stage 2: Editor assigned. However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. and JavaScript. Yes Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript . Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. good luck!! Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). You can appeal to the editorial board, giving a point-by-point argument against the editors views. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. 2002 (You are not allowed to say "Gamma" unless you give a shape and scale parameter). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . This implies that the scope of the work does not meet international standards and capacity in the journal's . [CDATA[// >