For example, the negative thinkers can be converted to positive thinkers with the help of the facilitator.

During hiring, employers can also include teamwork competencies as a requisite for selection. Group dynamism can give job satisfaction to the members. The research on team dynamics or team processes originates from the concept of groups dynamics and the Gestalt notion that the ‘whole is greater than the sum of its parts.’ The social psychologist, Kurt Lewins, conducted research on the interaction between individuals and considered group dynamics to describe both the positive and negative forces within a group (Dion 2000). To implement this into your group dynamics, let’s take a look at how this process works. Humphrey, S. E., Aime, F., Cushenbery, L., Hill, A. D., & Fairchild, J. In conclusion, the research on teamwork shows the importance of team dynamics and how unconscious psychological forces can impact how team members work together. Problems can come from weak leadership, too much deference to authority, blocking, groupthink and free riding, among others. Only a dream team (if one even exists) will work together, without deterring from the project’s goals—happy go lucky with the outcome you want in mind. Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Honest differences are often a healthy sign of progress.” This is also true when looking at the importance of group dynamics, especially in how they develop and mature.

There has been considerable research on team cohesion and performance that has mainly focused on factors that influence team cohesion, leading to specific team behaviors that enhance performance (Beale et al., 2003).

Academy of Management Review, 40, 235–262. In research on team cohesion, cognition, and conflict, the worst-performing teams were those whose team members clashed in their interactions and conversations. (2015). Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice.

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 58-70. In a meta-analytic review, Beale and colleagues examined the influence of components of cohesion (interpersonal attraction, task commitment, group pride) on performance criteria and found cohesion within teams led to team performance. Frustrations of slow-moving small towns turn into acceptance and the person might even regard those frustrations as being quaint or just a normal part of life. (2017). A series of studies conducted by Cooke and colleagues in the laboratory show support for the theory of interactive team cognition. If the group works as a cohesive group, the cooperation and convergence can result in maximiza­tion of productivity. 2. So, what is the process of creating a group alliance? 2.

Content Guidelines 2. Image Guidelines 5. Although individual knowledge is important, it is not enough to foster effective team work. Disclaimer 9.

Content Filtrations 6.


Most research on cognition focused on individual decision-making and information processing.