If the perceived probability of being pivotal is non-negligible, social preferences and expressive concerns are observationally equivalent. �����`��W��.3>����9�������aL�}v�2ē�F υK{����!�4��.�{�ac��l.�A��ċ�Z��U��),� The Balance: Which President Created More Jobs? Individual us- age data allow quantifying the monetary benefits associated with each ticket. Sie verlassen nun das Angebot des ifo Instituts und werden auf die Website unseres Partners CESifo umgeleitet. Arthur Blaustein: Who Manages the Economy Better? Meya, Johannes / Poutvaara, Panu / Schwager, Robert, Pocketbook Voting, Social Preferences, and Expressive Motives in Referenda, Öffentliche Finanzen und politische Ökonomie, Internationaler Institutionenvergleich und Migrationsforschung, Forschungsgruppe Steuer- und Finanzpolitik. We consider referenda among … They trace the rise of this gender gap to the decline in marriage and argue that the rising support for the Democratic Party among …
As voters had precise information on the individual costs and benefits, our setting comprises a real-world laboratory of direct democracy. Our empirical analysis studies collective choices which are analogous to decisions on local public goods. ifo verwendet Cookies, um Ihre Browser-Erfahrung einfacher und angenehmer zu machen und den Inhalt von Websites und Apps besser an Ihre Bedürfnisse und Präferenzen anzupassen.
��D���$� �T�&��& B�$%R��XR�h�
312, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU) - Faculty of Economics; ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universitaet Muenchen e.V. Insomuch as …
This contrasts with experi- mental studies on voting behavior which typically nd that in addition to … pocketbook voting assumes that specific economic conditions encourage particular voters to prioritize household well-being, even if their neighborhoods typically prioritize national or local prosperity.
We consider referenda among university students on whether to collectively purchase deeply discounted flat rate tickets for public transportation and cultural amenities.
Across the series, 11 of the 18 correlations (r) between per-sonal financial situation and vote (Democrat or Republican) are statistically significant (p < .05, two-tailed, average N = 938). Our results rule out purely expressive voting and imply that a substantial share of the electorate perceived their impact on the outcome to be non-negligible.
o/j,}3�^��Z����3�4��?5�2���, �UZ���N�p��)���+��G�8�E�B^���. In 1956, for ex- ample, perception of financial betterment was correlated .24 with …
Current findings suggest that pocketbook voting varies by education level (Gomez and Wilson 2006) and support the possibility of heterogeneity in voter behavior.