From my memory whatever I do, I always have felt like I did the wrong thing. I thought he was talking to one of his own men. THEN, the other says "Wait, brother, I think she's telling the truth.
2.
I lured him away from his men and killed him while he was unprepared.Still, I think this outcome could be argued from a Good standpoint (probably not a Lawful Good one, like you Lothar, but from a Chaotic one). The conversation the bandits have the moment you enter the cave indicates as much: "I'm not sure I like these Alik'r warriors hiding out here."
NOTHING.If i was going to hunt down a criminal, why shouldnt i get an offical permission, and show this permission to everyone? This is where their stories directly contradict.
If I kill Saadia myself, her burial urn appears within 24 hours.
I couldn't.
The Empire lost once, and the current Emperor is too weak-willed to be much of a leader; if you play the Dark Brotherhood questline, he lets you kill him without so much as a fight.
If nothing else, his taking her alive seems to imply that he was the one telling the truth. However, who she makes friends with is up to her. NEXT: The 10 Best Player Houses In Skyrim.
"In My Time of Need" hints at her innocence. I could not even consider subjecting someone to that. This is not a lie but an assumption which only came partly true.
I've played this quest through a couple of times now, and it's one of the most frustrating in the game, because of the lack of definitive information or closure.But after a lot of thought, I've concluded that the balance of evidence is quite strong against Saadia. Saadia publicly spoke out against the dominion (thalmor) in hammerfall which they control the empire. really?)
To cut off a potential future ally for no reason for the sake of gloating? there)
No, if he was an assassin, he would have killed her and left her in a ditch. First i agree to Topher and second:I miss something in Kematu´s story.
In My Time of Need was the quest that originally inspired me to write this blog.
NOT. What a half baked mission.
Ah! Just like the Imperial are doing, the player should play along with the Thalmor until the time is right to oppose them.Finding the morality in Skyrim may just be impossible, and maybe simply depends on whether the player believes the Stormcloaks, Thalmor or Imperials are good or evil.Funny Bethesda... Or brilliant? However I cannot take his side without having to lie to someone. When in a situation like this, inaction and action would be equally likely to result in an immoral decision. Very civil.Fact 3: If Saadia's story is true, then her pursuers are Thalmor-Sponsored Assassins. Hm. and expect to have to prove his words?
An aspiring writer, Michael is just trying to share his passion for video games with the world. However, is she? After completing the quest, Saadia seemed a bit, for lack of a better word, cold-hearted. The only alternative course of action Kematu suggests is lying to possibly an innocent woman who is trusting you so that they can kidnap her presumably to kill her. ... (storm cloaks) of skyrim.
There is no way to reverse the decision of adoption or adopt more than two children without mods so players should be careful which two children they decide to adopt! His word versus her word.
Well I managed to kill them all, but unfortunately I accidentally shot Lydia in the face with a Sparked arrow and killed her in the fight. Btw, this happens only after he paralyze her and you talk to him. His story is clear and concise, and all his supposed insults reveal is that he is not afraid of being blunt with the Dragonborn.
His best idea than offering solid evidence or proof is to make a counteroffer for you to do the "dirty work" of lying to a woman you may have a duty to protect from kidnappers and Thalmor assassins. How awful, but very Othello.